This is not bulletproof, but it will be another wall to avoid.

* At the beginning (or end) of a booking, Peter tells Mary he wants to post a review later.
* Mary logs into ESA and requests a randomly generated code.
* Peter gets the code from Mary.
* The code is requested on the review page. The code only allows Peter to only review Mary.

In this way we know that Peter has truly booked Mary. You can think of more complex options that will add little value. For example, Peter can ask a code, and in the request process ESA can verify (by GPS location) that Peter was indeed at Mary's venue.

This is not bulletproof.
The only way of avoiding self reviews is by checking the identity of the new usernames (with a phone call and an ID copy) but that will not be accepted by the users.

Far too much information swapping in that.... It gives Mary a bit more information on Peter and she can now equate him in reality to his online profile. It also means that geotagging can create street address for all the ladies and punters for the Five O or any other hacking group should servers ever get seized or hacked...

Given the Ashley Madison hack would you really want that kind of info out there in cyberspace.

I won't even comment on anyone seeing my ID. Never going to happen.

The system that is in place isn't perfect, but it does have the required checks and balances to make it as fair as possible for all involved.

I agree with deamonza and this system will also not work. What if the wg/mg in question knows she has not given him ( The client/ punter ) the service he deserves and nobody will know if a punter was cheated. This would also not be fair to the paying clients.

that system is pretty Stupid, Mary creates many fake aliases and generates many passwords for them to write sparkling reviews about her, half the fake reviews are working girls reviewing themselves or their pimp reviewing.... Problem number 2 Mary refuses to give a guy who booked an hour but she kicked out after 10 minutes a code so the whole esa thinks he is a liar when he says he was ripped off..,

Maybe the system should have a fake review proof, by giving a 6 month probation to new users. That way the system won't be abused as much as it is currently.

* Peter asks the code at the "beginning" of the booking (that might even inspire Mary to perform above average).

* Mary will know the face of Peter (nothing else), so what.

* ESA already knows Mary's address, they have sent the photographer.

* Peter doesn't need his own code, but if implemented, it will only verify his position (Mary's venue) at the moment of requesting it.

* No private information will be in ESA server other than the information that is there already. The code only links (temporarily) Mary's username with Peter's username.


As I said, this will not refrain wgs from creating aliases for selfies, unless ID of new usernames is required.

But then again, most of the wg's who do not get positive reviews do not last that long advertising. So if there is probation for new users, the wg's who practice fake reviewing will be out of circulation and as for the code what happens when you are fiven a wrong one knowing that she hav you a k*k service.

Hi,

Jumping in a bit late but here is my 5 cents worth or should it be 5 rand where the currency is going?

Adding more probation on new users is a bad idea, Not all of us sit and contribute to the forum regularly, and having posts moderated already now combined with not being able to review will make this for someone like me or most new comers not worth the while.

Secondly, how many times in the comments column of a lady with a new listing do you see the comments flow along the line of 2 laaities standing on a dam wall ready to jump. Hey man Ill jump if you jump, or you go first, no you go first.

I agree that valuable information is sourced from the brave on the forum (The guys that take the plunge so to speak) and when a new member does make a booking and has to really report either a scary incident or a real awesome piece of information and is 1 - being moderated on the forum and 2 - on a six month probation for reviewing (as proposed) what good is that going to do?

Is it really that difficult to spot a selfie or a fanboy for that matter?

I dunno, flay me for my views but if I have to go and ask for a code and do any more admin to get a review in or wait six months to review it is going to be pretty hard to convince me to fork over a subscription just to see a higher definition photograph as a new member.

Just a few thoughts.
Piece and Love.

Point made however personally if I have to visit a wg and have to rely on a review to brave the courage to visit I do not take into account reviews of those that are still cutting their teeth. I believe that they wouldn't be able to differentiate between a good or bad punt. A punter has to earn punting review respect. We all have punters that we sort of follow because we trust their judgment.

Review works fine for me. I don't tell my username on ESA to any lady and only review at later stage. Lady does not have to know who I am or what my member status is.

I will definately not give copy of my ID to any adult site.