Name: Thanda

City: Johannesburg

Area: Midrand

Last Visit: February 2015

Full Profile: [View Thanda's Full Profile]

______________________________________________________

What a lady. Had an awesome time and I will definitely be coming back for more. The owo was pretty good, and she sures enjoying leaving you breathless once she done
______________________________________________________

Ratings:

Face: 4/5
Body: 5/5
Personality: 5/5
Telephone Manner: 5/5
Venue Cleanliness: 4/5
Personal Cleanliness: 5/5
Privacy: 4/5
Service: 5/5
______________________________________________________

Will you return? Yes
Advertiser looked like the Photos? Yes
Secure Parking? Yes

PS: To easily submit a review like this, go to the Advertiser's page and click "Rate this Advertiser" (if you are a Gold Member) or "Review this Advertiser" (if you are a Free Member)

Name: Thanda

City: Johannesburg

Area: Midrand

Last Visit: March 2015

Full Profile: [View Thanda's Full Profile]

______________________________________________________

Not worth the visit, disappointed, great venue safe and secure but I I would not return. Lady looked nothing like the photos can only blame that on the photoshop
______________________________________________________

Ratings:

Face: 2/5
Body: 2/5
Personality: 4/5
Telephone Manner: 4/5
Venue Cleanliness: 5/5
Personal Cleanliness: 4/5
Privacy: 5/5
Service: 4/5
______________________________________________________

Will you return? No
Advertiser looked like the Photos? No
Secure Parking? Yes

PS: To easily submit a review like this, go to the Advertiser's page and click "Rate this Advertiser" (if you are a Gold Member) or "Review this Advertiser" (if you are a Free Member)

Joker..i agree esa must stop the photoshopping. As paying customets and gold members we have the right not to be mislead. Sock n tired of esa bs. We oay the site. Without us no one will advertise. We take a risk with no photos, travel distances to get there then waste our money cos we that far. [Name of competitor site removed - they don't pay us advertising fees and until they do, we won't allow the mention of their name]is a bit better.

[@turak: we take photoshopping very seriously and photograhpers have to pay a R 2000 fine if they photoshop. They are only allowed to remove tatoos IF and ONLY if the advertiser also hides her face, because in that case it is a privacy issue.

In this case we cannot see any photoshopping taking place. Also, Joker2202 only has a free account, and the photos he can see has been reduced by 82% in detail. We cannot take his word that the advertiser looked exactly the same, as he could not see 82% of the detail.

You have also worded your post in such a way that it seems we photoshop everything. We challenge you to find 2 active profiles where the current picture set have been photoshopped. We will give you 1 month gold membership for every 2 active profiles (with their current picturesets photoshopped).

Please note: the definition of "photoshopped" is when a photographer uses the "mask/selection" tool in photoshop to blur and or airbrush a section. On these photos you will see a "faded break" where the blur stops. No-face tatoo removals do not count. A small amount of old-school camera tricks are allowed (the tricks that photographers used years before digital cameras, computers and photoshop came along) ]