On 2025-03-23 10:03:01 Colonizer said:
Isn't it ironic that escorts, often seen as the 'safer' and more exclusive option due to their higher prices, might actually pose a greater risk for spreading STDs than street prostitutes? Many clients assume that paying a premium means they're getting a cleaner, more selective experience---yet they're far more likely to throw caution to the wind and engage in unprotected oral, even rimming, with an escort, something they'd never dream of doing with a street walker. Could this false sense of security be making escorts the real hidden danger? And let's be honest---just because you shower before seeing an escort doesn't mean you're washing away the risks.

Many a time I'm asked whether or not I provide OWO and I'm literally horrified that such is even an option for both punters and working girls.

I've posted this once before: Herpes, especially HSV1 (oral herpes), can be spread to the genitals and subsequently become the HSV2 strain. What's frigtening is that HSV1 cannot always be detected since it comes and goes and some dont even experience systems. So in retrospect, the lady, whether she's a WG or not, provides you with some pleasure for a brief moment, but wham, you are coursed with a liftime STD, and what's worse, you take that home to your partner.

Same for a lady; if a man has the HSV2 strain and gets a bareblow---well, then the lady may contract the virus orally (HSV1) and so the cycle continues.